Citizens United v. FEC

“[I]f speech can be prohibited because, in the view of the Government, it leads to ‘moral decay’ or does not serve ‘public ends,’ then there is no limit to the Government’s censorship power.”

Justice Antonin Scalia, concurring in Citizens United v. FEC (2010).

Not much more to say…


  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gordon Firemark, Entertainment Law and Movie Lawyer, Movie Lawyer. Movie Lawyer said: RT entlawupdate: Citizens United v. FEC […]

    Pingback by Tweets that mention Citizens United v. FEC « ContiFazz -- on January 23, 2010 at 11:53 pm

  2. The Supreme Court’s decision in the Citizens United case is a demonstration of the partisanship of the Justices. Here is another post on this topic. See:

    Comment by Wendy Phillips on January 26, 2010 at 9:58 pm

  3. That truth has been nicely worded.

    -Fame Appeal

    Comment by Fame Appeal on March 12, 2010 at 6:03 pm

Submit a comment: